#1
Posted 14 February 2003 - 08:27 PM
just wondering if anybody has a favorite way to cook their brulee.
I just did some in a convection oven, low fan, 225 and they got a bit wierd on top. In oval dishes, BTW.
Good texture inside. Just a bit wierd on top.
I welcome any input.
thanks.
#2
Posted 14 February 2003 - 08:37 PM
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#3
Posted 14 February 2003 - 08:38 PM
#4
Posted 14 February 2003 - 09:06 PM
A bit of a skin on top.
It's not broken, just a bit rough on top.
I use a torch to brulee but am super interested in one of those electronic salamander type things.
I saw it on the food network best pastry comp and did a websearch and found them for about 129.00 bucks. I might be able to get one @ my new gig since the chef seems to be more then willing to spend on stuff that improves quality.
I just started there a week ago and redid the dessert menu this week and sales are already up!!!
#5
Posted 14 February 2003 - 09:41 PM
Agreed. My friends don't call me "Sparky" for no reason. Blowtorch is also multi-purpose. Light grill. Loosen rusted on bolts, etc.Best way: blowtorch.
#6
Posted 15 February 2003 - 12:29 AM
#7
Posted 15 February 2003 - 01:04 AM
#8
Posted 15 February 2003 - 08:01 PM
Today we did them in the convection oven in hotel pans @225, load off. They got raves last night, skin or not, :-).
Have to tell you though, there's some weird ovens in this place. I wasn't digging this convection oven for this flourless choc cake I was doing so I put them in a regular oven upstairs, and found out it basically has no temp unless you put it on @ 500!!!
My assistant had put them in so I found them and threw them into the convection oven and they turned out ok. I don't like it because it makes them rise unevenly, usually.
I'm also in a higher altitude so i'm sure it probably affects it.
#9
Posted 12 December 2003 - 03:55 PM
1) Beating the custard with an electric beater rather than a whisk. The surface gets foamy, but I skim all the foam off. Still, I wonder if using a whisk, at least when adding the cream to the egg mixture would reduce foaming.
2) Amount of water in the bain marie. Could it be that I don't enough (or that I have too) water ? I fill to just below the top of the custard in the ramekins.
Anyone ?
- S
#10
Posted 12 December 2003 - 04:25 PM
Luckily, crispy, caramelized sugar can hide a multitude of sins. No one but me knew about it.
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#11
Posted 12 December 2003 - 05:10 PM
#12
Posted 12 December 2003 - 06:16 PM
Make food ... not war
#13
Posted 12 December 2003 - 06:27 PM
If you have foamy bubbles hit them with a torch quickly BEFORE you put them in the oven
#14
Posted 12 December 2003 - 08:49 PM
chefette is right, the quick pass with the torch before you bake at any bubbles will insure a smooth finish.STIR with the whisk - no beating!!!!!!!!
If you have foamy bubbles hit them with a torch quickly BEFORE you put them in the oven
Also, I quickly cook my custard on the fire ala creme anglaise, then strain before pouring into my dishes, a technique that I got here on the 'gullet.
Always works for me.
Also, I prefer a radiant oven over convection for my brulee.
#15
Posted 12 December 2003 - 10:37 PM
#16
Posted 13 December 2003 - 05:47 AM
I prefer a convection oven and then dry bake the brulee - much faster and more consistent results. But you need a good convection oven
#17
Posted 13 December 2003 - 03:32 PM
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#18
Posted 13 December 2003 - 04:38 PM
Steve,The torch does seem to get rid of the micro-bubbles. I know a few people who also cover their trays of brulees with plastic wrap, tightly stretched right down to the surface. Seems to keep them more moist and helps prevent the surface from overcooking.
Plastic wrap won't melt at 250/300 f?
I always cover my flans in the pan with plastic but I bake them at 225f.
chefette,chefette:
I prefer a convection oven and then dry bake the brulee - much faster and more consistent results. But you need a good convection oven
Can you explain what you mean by dry bake?
No waterbath?
#19
Posted 13 December 2003 - 06:01 PM
Pastry Chef
#20
Posted 13 December 2003 - 06:53 PM
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#21
Posted 13 December 2003 - 10:19 PM
Pastry Chef
#22
Posted 13 December 2003 - 11:44 PM
I make the custard base the day before I bake off the brulees. This gives the proteins time to absorb the excess water and ensures a creamy texture. I strain right after tempering, cool in an ice bath then into the fridge till the next day. I think this time helps with the air bubbles as well.
I place a side towel/ napkin on the sheet tray with the ramekins on top. This keeps the ramekins from sliding when you pour the water off.
I place a second sheet tray, inverted, on top of the ramekin filled sheet tray. This works well for me but I have also heard the plastic wrap idea works great.
Good luck.
#23
Posted 13 December 2003 - 11:55 PM
I apologize if I gave the impression of being an expert on anything! In retrospect, my post might have seemed like a taunt, but I didn't intend it that way. I'm just a liitle surprised that everyone is convinced that entrained air is the problem. We can usually get into arguments over much less! I went on record with the air theory, up above, becuase fish taked about beating the custard. But the more I think about it, the less persuasive I find this theory.Dave you seem to be quite an authority on "egg based" subjects (no pun intended), what is your opinion?
I'm not sure exactly what fish is referring to, but what I observed was not a few microbubbles. It was a slightly spongy, lighter colored layer, about 1/4 inch thick, on top of the custard. It would take a lot of air to cause it. I cooked on the stove first -- without boiling or beating, I strained the custard, I gave the portions a good hard tap, and I didn't see any bubbles before baking -- so even if I had known about the trick with the torch, there wouldn't have been any reaon to employ it.
So now I'm wondering if it wasn't a case of too high a temperature causing evaporation above the level of the water bath, as fish surmised originally.
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#24
Posted 14 December 2003 - 12:07 AM
Also I would like to point out that my inquiry about your opinion (Dave) was genuine; I was really impressed with some of the posts that you wrote for the egg cookery topic. Very interesting and well backed.
Pastry Chef
#25
Posted 14 December 2003 - 12:42 AM
(Thanks for your clarification. And for the compliment.)
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#26
Posted 14 December 2003 - 06:53 AM
Oven-baked, and just from trials and observations, too many bubbles formed into a spongy layer on top seems to occur when the mixture is 1) whisked too vigorously and or 2) baked uncovered at too high heat. Bubbles can also be created by sloppily/too quickly pouring the base into the ramekins. It's certainly possible there are other factors--but torching away surface froth, lowering the heat, NOT whisking vigorously and covering with plastic wrap does produce a wonderful smooth brulee with a glassine surface. Any of these will help Fish improve his product. It seems the suggestion of making the unbaked base mixture a day ahead is also worth testing out side by side.
Stove-top seems to present differently. It's possible to do a very smooth bubble-free "stove-top" brulee literally on the stovetop or in the microwave, as it is a lemon curd. It "seems" to me that gradual heating in the microwave is gentler, more even and less bubble-activating than on the stovetop. The slower temperature rise and gentler stirring tends to promote more cohesive bonds possibly.
Stove-top brulees poured in ramekins after cooking "seem" to work better when you allow the mixture to cool first--and even overnight--then re-warmed slightly and pour. I never get bubbles and I pour it out very thinly into a wide shallow bowl--and then allow it to-re-set--cover with plastic and I'm good to go. (I don't brulee these, just build a dessert on top of this thin layer.) I cool my stove-top batches down with plastic pressed down on the surface--and when cold spoon out quenelles or pipe or pour as a cream. Sometimes I've poured it into half sheet pans or into flexipans to cool and freeze, but that has been for use as a component, not for use as a primary showcase--as it might be poured into a large ramekin.
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#27
Posted 14 December 2003 - 08:03 AM
This actually sounds to me like the custard overbaked in the oven. Essentially the mixture boiled a bit on the top and that is what caused the foamy, spongy texture.I'm not sure exactly what fish is referring to, but what I observed was not a few microbubbles. It was a slightly spongy, lighter colored layer, about 1/4 inch thick, on top of the custard. It would take a lot of air to cause it. I cooked on the stove first -- without boiling or beating, I strained the custard, I gave the portions a good hard tap, and I didn't see any bubbles before baking -- so even if I had known about the trick with the torch, there wouldn't have been any reaon to employ it.
And I just wanted to clarify that while I cook my mix on the stove top, I don't actually go all the way to the creme anglais stage. I just boil the milk and cream and temper the eggs with the hot liquid. I pour the warm base in dishes and bake in a shallow water bath at about 325 F. Starting with a warm to hot mixture reduces the amount of time in the oven so the custard doesn't loose too much moisture and helps it to cook more evenly. I believe that putting a cold mix in the oven might tend to promote overbaking because you would have to leave it in longer to cook to the center, so there is more chance of the edges getting too hot before the center is done.
#28
Posted 20 December 2003 - 12:35 PM
Anyway, what type of sugar do I sprinkle on top? Turbinado, regular white sugar, superfine?
Thanks,
Joe
#29
Posted 20 December 2003 - 01:00 PM
There will be 25 of us for the meal. Is it possible to make this in a large container, for example, the French white type lasagne dish? I am wondering if the centres will cook thru' in the same amount of time.
Can I keep it cool, bake the second one, and then do the carmalizing just before serving?
www.hillmanweb.com
#30
Posted 20 December 2003 - 01:29 PM
Jason
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: French
The Kitchen →
Cooking →
First time making confit de canard en sous videStarted by Simon Lewinson , 04 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Culinary Culture →
Food Media & Arts →
French charcuterie workshops in the USStarted by Jeffrey Weiss , 09 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Regional Cuisine →
Europe →
France →
France: Dining →
A Seriously Belated Paris Trip ReportStarted by Kim Shook , 23 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
The Kitchen →
Pastry & Baking →
Pâte à choux varietyStarted by jmacnaughtan , 02 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
The Kitchen →
Cookbooks & References →
Desserts of Brittany (Bretagne)Started by Indirect Heat , 14 Jan 2013 |
|
|









