Kitchen Confidential TV Show on FOX
#1
Posted 30 September 2004 - 06:12 AM
"Fox has given a script commitment to a project called Kitchen Confidential from Darren Star (Sex and the City), based on the book by Anthony Bourdain, and produced by New Line TV / 20th / Darren Star Prods. The premise is restaurant life from the POV of the chef and kitchen staff, per Hollywood Reporter. "
Darren Star? Maybe we could call ths show "Cobra Heart 90210".
Still a big fan though, Tony!
#2
Posted 30 September 2004 - 06:38 AM
more specific, graphic details ...."Fox has given a script commitment to a project called Kitchen Confidential from Darren Star (Sex and the City),
New Line, which has the rights to Bourdain's best seller, will produce 'Kitchen' through New Line TV, along with Darren Star Productions and 20th Century Fox television.
#3
Posted 30 September 2004 - 06:59 AM
#4
Posted 30 September 2004 - 07:48 AM
SATC creator to produce Bourdain's Kitchen ConfidentialThe creator of HBO hit series 'Sex and the City' is ditching Manolo Blahniks for hip New York restaurants, after being signed by Fox TV to produce 'Kitchen', based on Anthony Bourdain's best-selling book 'Kitchen Confidential'.
=R=
LTHForum.com -- The definitive Chicago-based culinary chat site
ronnie_suburban 'at' yahoo.com
#5
Posted 30 September 2004 - 08:05 AM
Details, Tonyyyy!!!
foodblogs: Dining Downeast I - Dining Downeast II
Portland Food Map.com
#6
Posted 30 September 2004 - 08:14 AM
From Brand Republic...
SATC creator to produce Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential
=R=
Gee, Ronnie, I think this link is starting to look a bit familiar
#7
Posted 30 September 2004 - 09:00 AM
#8
Posted 30 September 2004 - 09:06 AM
#10
Posted 30 September 2004 - 10:10 AM
LOL! I am thoroughly repetitive, if nothing else.Gee, Ronnie, I think this link is starting to look a bit familiar
(see my post above)...
=R=
LTHForum.com -- The definitive Chicago-based culinary chat site
ronnie_suburban 'at' yahoo.com
#11
Posted 30 September 2004 - 10:18 AM
#12
Posted 30 September 2004 - 10:19 AM
#13
Posted 30 September 2004 - 11:25 AM
personally, i am very very happy to see final valid confirmation regarding a project "speculation" that pops up quite frequently.
on the flip side, i must admit if i hear any more correlative comparisons between "Bourdain's back of house" and "Jean-Georges's front of house," i think i am going to beat myself with a frying pan.
Cheers, and looking forward!
#14
Posted 30 September 2004 - 12:07 PM
#15
Posted 30 September 2004 - 12:41 PM
They have to be able to show nudity, fornication and allow cussing like a sailor.
Perhaps it'll debut on HBO or Showtime, if we're lucky.
“Peter: Oh my god, Brian, there's a message in my Alphabits. It says, 'Oooooo.'
Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios.”
– From Fox TV’s “Family Guy”
#16
Posted 30 September 2004 - 12:45 PM
I didn't see any mention of Tony's potential participation. If he were a technical advisor or producer that would certainly lend the project some credibility
well i could be completely wrong, but from what i gather, the rights to the book were bought outright. however, i don't think a lack of the author's "creative input" into the show detracts at all from the project's "credibility."
i believe it is rather standard practice to purchase most writers' work (this includes screenplays, e.g.) and offer nothing to the writer in terms of production. it takes a very strong, dedicated, passionate person to demand those rights (and usually at a sacrifice of monetary compensation).
Edited by abbe, 30 September 2004 - 12:50 PM.
#17
Posted 30 September 2004 - 12:59 PM
Huh, I'll bet the sous chef will be a woman. And blonde. Or, the restaurant owner, having suffered a death or divorce, and forced to take over her family's or husband's restaurant, will be blonde and buxom, and forever clashing with the charismatic bad-boy chef. Until they fall into bed.
Uhhhhhhhh, are you aware that Tony already had something like that in another of his books? The Bobby Gold Stories. IMO, his best work of fiction (after KC).
#18
Posted 30 September 2004 - 01:23 PM
Perhaps I should have qualified my remarks by saying that as an eGullet member and solely for me personally Tony's participation would make it more likely that I would find the finished product credible and/or authentic. Better?well i could be completely wrong, but from what i gather, the rights to the book were bought outright. however, i don't think a lack of the author's "creative input" into the show detracts at all from the project's "credibility."
I would agree that many writers who option their work would be shut out of a production once the check clears, but I'm currently working on a tv project where the writer is an executive producer, and this isn't the first time.i believe it is rather standard practice to purchase most writers' work (this includes screenplays, e.g.) and offer nothing to the writer in terms of production. it takes a very strong, dedicated, passionate person to demand those rights (and usually at a sacrifice of monetary compensation).
I'd certainly include Tony in your subset of writers who are strong, dedicated and passionate. My guess (and I hope he'll correct me if I'm wrong) is that he, with his profile and the fact that it is an autobiographical work, could have included a clause about his participation in the project if he chose to.
#19
Posted 30 September 2004 - 01:52 PM
oh i'm sorry. i didn't mean to imply he wasn't these things as a WRITER. i meant to say it takes one very dedicated and passionate about the PROJECT to demand production rights.I'd certainly include Tony in your subset of writers who are strong, dedicated and passionate.
i know quite a few writers who gladly sell their work outright, no strings attached, as they have no interest in the "show business" side of the creative process. this is what i meant. (better?
#20
Posted 30 September 2004 - 01:58 PM
#21
Posted 30 September 2004 - 02:01 PM
And I agreeoh i'm sorry. i didn't mean to imply he wasn't these things as a WRITER. i meant to say it takes one very dedicated and passionate about the PROJECT to demand production rights.
i know quite a few writers who gladly sell their work outright, no strings attached, as they have no interest in the "show business" side of the creative process. this is what i meant. (better?)
#22
Posted 30 September 2004 - 02:56 PM
I would agree with that. Too much of a chance that they will “cute” it up and make it more of a dumbed down joke than quality show.It won't properly fly on Fox.
They have to be able to show nudity, fornication and allow cussing like a sailor.
Perhaps it'll debut on HBO or Showtime, if we're lucky.
#23
Posted 01 October 2004 - 10:15 AM
#24
Posted 01 October 2004 - 10:29 AM
So...does this mean you're not going to introduce us to Jason Priestly?Hell, I'm drinking Guiness and eatig Steak and Ale pie in Dublin. This all came as news to me. Still processing it.
=R=
LTHForum.com -- The definitive Chicago-based culinary chat site
ronnie_suburban 'at' yahoo.com
#25
Posted 01 October 2004 - 10:48 AM
I would agree with that. Too much of a chance that they will “cute” it up and make it more of a dumbed down joke than quality show.
quality show? ahem. have you *read* Kitchen Confidential?
#26
Posted 01 October 2004 - 11:01 AM
You can't go wrong with a pint at Toner's or Mulligan's. I hope you'll give us a trip report.Hell, I'm drinking Guiness and eatig Steak and Ale pie in Dublin. This all came as news to me. Still processing it.
#27
Posted 01 October 2004 - 11:04 AM
Huh, I'll bet the sous chef will be a woman. And blonde. Or, the restaurant owner, having suffered a death or divorce, and forced to take over her family's or husband's restaurant, will be blonde and buxom, and forever clashing with the charismatic bad-boy chef. Until they fall into bed.
i'll happily become a blonde
#29
Posted 01 October 2004 - 01:01 PM
Or F/X, which is amazingly permissive with language and sex. I'd much rather see it attempted there, with Nip/Tuck or the Shield's creative team taking a stab at it.It won't properly fly on Fox.
They have to be able to show nudity, fornication and allow cussing like a sailor.
Perhaps it'll debut on HBO or Showtime, if we're lucky.
#30
Posted 01 October 2004 - 08:12 PM
FilmStew.com adds the fact that Star is directing as well as producing. New Line TV is the third partner aside from 20th Century Fox and Darren Star Productions.
Both the Filmstew article and one from the Advocate.com seem to mention that nothing's been written yet. They are still searching for a writer to adapt this.
Usually this is the stage where good properties are most at risk of going bad. All you'd need is some chucklehead who thinks they know better than Tony to write a bad script.
Please note that even though Star is best know for "Sex and the City", apparently he started out working for Aaron Spelling, on crappy shows like "Beverly Hills 90210" and "Melrose Place".










