Joanne Kates at the Globe
#1
Posted 19 January 2004 - 10:09 AM
So, what is this womens problem?
Every week I read her reveiws, and week in week out she scathes wherever she dines. Are the restaurants really this bad in TO or does she have some other problem? I think if I was subjected to that many bad experiences, I'd look for work in another field.
#2
Posted 19 January 2004 - 10:18 AM
#3
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:44 AM
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#4
Posted 22 January 2004 - 01:13 PM
#5
Posted 23 January 2004 - 07:20 AM
Any Torontonians out there have a view??
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#6
Posted 23 January 2004 - 12:32 PM
Edited by jcsaucey, 23 January 2004 - 12:36 PM.
J.Chovancek
#7
Posted 24 January 2004 - 09:13 AM
-Steve
Edited by SteveW, 24 January 2004 - 09:14 AM.
#8
Posted 24 January 2004 - 10:42 AM
J.Chovancek
#9
Posted 24 January 2004 - 10:50 AM
Not to my knowledge...acquaintance might be more accurate having followed many of them for a number of years.Do you know if Joanne is personal friends with any(or all) of the "boys"?
-Steve
Anyone read today's review on Ultra? Paul Boehmer was fabulous at Opus, but she wasn't as complementary to him today as she used to be. Anyone eaten at Ultra yet?
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#10
Posted 24 January 2004 - 11:47 AM
She managed to drop Stadtlanders name into yet another review. I swear she gets an extra nickle every time she writes his name. You could make a drinking game out of it. Paul Boehmer was his sous chef-about seventeen years ago.Anyone read today's review on Ultra? Paul Boehmer was fabulous at Opus, but she wasn't as complementary to him today as she used to be.
J.Chovancek
#11
Posted 24 January 2004 - 06:56 PM
My all time favourite has to be the one where she did a "hatchet job" on one or two Whistler restaurants while she was on a BC "road trip".
I do not recollect whether it was the Bearfoot Bistro but it definitely..from her description...was one of those upper end spots in the Village.
She went on about the snooty service and how consescending the service was as they were more interested in serving the Americans who had a lot of cash. She noted one table in particular where some "bluebloods" were living the high life with someone who purportedly was a formula one driver.
The waiter said that the chef was cooking a treat for them. A particularly "special" ham called, "jambon"
She continued on like that before commenting that that Formula One driver subsequently turned out to be that French con artist who was recently convicted in Victoria for fraud who had been passing himself off as a French Rockerfeller or Rothschild or the like duping rich folks from Long Island to the west coast.
It had me in stitches.
#12
Posted 24 January 2004 - 07:21 PM
#13
Posted 26 January 2004 - 06:08 PM
She seems to focus on demographic issues in terms of service. Since K. and I are in the same demographic, age-wise and, I'm assuming, waist-size wise, we "hear" her loud and clear.
There are indeed some lousy eateries in TO.
#14
Posted 08 February 2004 - 08:02 AM
Very interesting that Joanne Kates & you, both dislike the desserts made by Dessert Trends. In a previous eGullet thread in the Toronto section, I brought up Dessert Trends, & it got praise from all that responded.She was right on IMHO about Dessert Trends last Saturday. Bland and blah! Have used them on a couple occasions, looked beautiful, tasted blah. Quite oily too.
-Steve
#15
Posted 12 February 2004 - 12:49 AM
#16
Posted 12 February 2004 - 12:00 PM
Steve,Very interesting that Joanne Kates & you, both dislike the desserts made by Dessert Trends. In a previous eGullet thread in the Toronto section, I brought up Dessert Trends, & it got praise from all that responded.She was right on IMHO about Dessert Trends last Saturday. Bland and blah! Have used them on a couple occasions, looked beautiful, tasted blah. Quite oily too.
-Steve
Interesting in what way?
As I said in my post, IMHO only. I'm pleased to hear in your previous posts that it got praise from all that responded. To each his own, no?
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#17
Posted 13 February 2004 - 07:24 AM
It's OK, the more feedback the better(praise and/or non-praise). Until you chimed with your comments about Dessert Trends, I thought this establishment was universally liked by everyone in Toronto.Steve,
Very interesting that Joanne Kates & you, both dislike the desserts made by Dessert Trends. In a previous eGullet thread in the Toronto section, I brought up Dessert Trends, & it got praise from all that responded.She was right on IMHO about Dessert Trends last Saturday. Bland and blah! Have used them on a couple occasions, looked beautiful, tasted blah. Quite oily too.
-Steve
Interesting in what way?
As I said in my post, IMHO only. I'm pleased to hear in your previous posts that it got praise from all that responded. To each his own, no?
-Steve
#18
Posted 13 February 2004 - 03:53 PM
I believe Kates is a CB grad not GB. THe fact that a severe critic may come in, unannounced, and prepared for perfection should put restaurant workers on their toes, ready to make every plate well prepared, close to the menu, on time, and served perfunctorily. If some of our restautants differ from the excellence attained in Montreal and Vancouver, perhaps that difference is merely attitude.It is rather funny that someone should create such a thread because when it comes to venomous spurge for this woman I beleive that I am the king. I have read her for years believing her to be the most legitimate of food writers especially here in TO. My God, the more I learn about fooed the more I realize that her opinion is just that and at the end of the day her opinion of food amounts to not vey little. It is the placing of this relic on some sort of culinary pedestal that has kept TO dining behind of the progression and stature of Montreal and Vancouver. No one is challenged because our most prominent food writers have their head so trapped in the sphincter of a selected collection of cooks that made there names back in the Cal/Ital and ConFusion days when mint jelly beans and clear consommes (that is the way they are supposed to be) were considered high-end and the epitamy of culinary skill. From what I read she still is trapped in this time warp, the botox will not help and your golden era has turned to tarnish. Without getting into some sort of bad "English"-style urinate your name in the snow bank" public call out I must admit that my idea of PR was to have this woman thrown out of the restaurant I work at because I feel she lacks the knowledge and palette to judge what myself and my staff are able to execute.I guess when the in ability to do is usurped by the ability to critize then we will always remain the poor little disregarded, ugly sister of Vancouver and Montreal. Why would Ducasse come here to be judged by some half rate,GB grad, camp running travesty of some pefrceiceved culinarily improtanance when he can go to Montreal and vicariously compete with the best our country has to offer.
#19
Posted 17 February 2004 - 10:44 PM
PS, J. Kates, sorry if I offended but you do make me nuts with your reviews sometimes, but then again when I lived in England I never missed your reviews. So Cheers.
#20
Posted 18 February 2004 - 09:37 AM
cookskorner
Practice. Do it over. Get it right.
Mostly, I want people to be as happy eating my food as I am cooking it.
#21
Posted 18 February 2004 - 11:58 AM
Excellent point, Marlene -- many other groups are doing this.I don't actually get the Sat globe, so I can't comment on her column. However, if we want to put her reviews to the test, all we need to do is organize our own dinner there to review eGullet style
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#22
Posted 18 February 2004 - 02:21 PM
cookskorner
Practice. Do it over. Get it right.
Mostly, I want people to be as happy eating my food as I am cooking it.
#23
Posted 18 February 2004 - 07:14 PM
#24
Posted 19 February 2004 - 11:09 AM
#25
Posted 19 February 2004 - 11:13 AM
Excellent idea.Yes, though it's fun living vicariously, it would be a deliciously fine idea to have some of our own outings. JK's last column wasn't much of a review, but we can always dig out a past review or see what's in future columns.
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#26
Posted 19 February 2004 - 11:33 AM
cookskorner
Practice. Do it over. Get it right.
Mostly, I want people to be as happy eating my food as I am cooking it.
#27
Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:10 PM
edit; grammar
Edited by GordonCooks, 19 February 2004 - 01:34 PM.
#28
Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:21 PM
I agree. And you've mentioned many of my favourite restaurants as well, with the exception of Opus, a personal favourite.Toronto has always been a dining destination for me. It's diversity, geographical location, and variety of restaurants is on par will just about any city you can come up with. I’ve never read a Kates review so I can’t give an opinion but I have followed James Chatto and Alan Vernon and found their taste to be quite similar to my own. Meals at Susur, The Fifth, North 44, Centro (old), Scaramouche, Chiado, Eigensinn Farm, Avalon, Canoe, Pangaea, Rain, Senses, Mercer St Grill, Mildred Pierce, Bar Italia, JOV, Hiro Sushi, Lai Wah Heen, Hemispheres, Bright Pearl, Barberians, Auberge du Pommier, Courtyard Café, Truffles, Sotto Sotto, Korea House, Monsoon…etc All have been memorable in one way of the other. Fantastic preparation, great local ingredients, superior architecture/design, warm service – etc. Toronto, in my humble opinion, has something for everyone.
CooksKorner.com
Good friends help you move, real friends help you move bodies.
#29
Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:55 PM
1) He's one of JK's golden boys and I think she wrote a review in Dec.
2) We can address the grumblings discussed in the Kennedy thread.
3) If we can get a group of us, I'm sure we can try almost all the offerings, since it is a grazing type menu.
4) I haven't been yet.
Comments?
#30
Posted 19 February 2004 - 02:02 PM
I'm gonna be there this saturday for lunch -Gordoncooks listed most of the finer restos, however, I was thinking maybe we should tackle Jamie Kennedy's new place for the following reasons:
1) He's one of JK's golden boys and I think she wrote a review in Dec.
2) We can address the grumblings discussed in the Kennedy thread.
3) If we can get a group of us, I'm sure we can try almost all the offerings, since it is a grazing type menu.
4) I haven't been yet.![]()
Comments?
Fri Night is Bymark and Sat night is Susur. I'll have to get my hands on a copy of her review.









