Your favorite couverture
#1
Posted 25 November 2003 - 12:47 PM
Josh Usovsky
"Will Work For Sugar"
#2
Posted 28 November 2003 - 11:34 AM
To begin with I am no expert by any means, however I have used Callebaut (both semi-sweet and milk & a little white & am happy with it. I have recently purchased a different brand of Belgium chocolate called OCG. I really like the milk as it is really creamy tasting to me. Sorry not much more I can tell you.
Good Luck
Rookie - Mary
#3
Posted 28 November 2003 - 11:45 AM
The Callebaut milk chocolate was divine, though it never made it into any recipes.
I have since picked up a batch of Schokinag's bittersweet, but haven't had time to do much more than break off a few big chunks and eat it.
As for different kinds/brands, I definitely will go for the more intense chocolates for desserts that will benefit from it. A nice dark Vahlrona has a great complex flavor that is wonderful for adding dimension when paired with a lighter, sweeter chocolate. And I usually mix two intensities of chocolate when making my ganaches.
Edited by kthull, 28 November 2003 - 11:51 AM.
#4
Posted 29 November 2003 - 11:33 AM
Pastry Chef
#5
Posted 29 November 2003 - 07:54 PM
"Sweet dreams are made of this" - Eurithmics
#6
Posted 30 November 2003 - 04:34 AM
#7
Posted 30 November 2003 - 08:29 PM
My suggestion is that you try different chocolates as you encounter them. See what you like.
Rich
#8
Posted 19 October 2007 - 05:47 PM
I am not an expert on chocolates, but over the years have had enough opportunities to use a few different brands of chocolates on different applications to notice the difference in term of flavor and texture. Personally I like Callebaut/Cocoa Barry and Valrhona. I prefer Valrhona when making very chocolatey desserts, like a rich chocolate mousse. I like it's cocoa powder for a rich, chocolatey devil's food cake. If it wasn't for the cost, I would use Valrhona is a lot more applications.
E. Guittard - I like it but I've only used it for candy making like ganache and enrobing. It has good flavor and good viscosity.
Shaffenberger - I think this chocolate is a little too viscous and sometimes it get difficult to use.
Des Alpes by Albert Uster - I am not too crazy about it's flavor, I think it's a little sweet and in my experience a little tempremental. I have difficulties tempering this chocolate on several occasions (that may just be my lack of skill in tempering).
El Ray - I have only used this for tempering - for showpiece purposes.
Peter's - Do not like the flavor at all and very viscous
Cocoa Noel, Weiss, Michel Cluziel, Felchlin etc, just a few more out there that I haven't used before.
What have you used and what is your experience with them?
Thanks!
#9
Posted 19 October 2007 - 06:21 PM
#10
Posted 20 October 2007 - 08:55 PM
Few reasons
1. I can buy it locally for $39.99 for 11 lbs. This is by far cheaper than anything else I can get.
2. My audience. For the most part, I bake for regular people. In my taste tests, they like semisweet more than bittersweet. They also find Callebaut to be more "generic" than Valrhona (for example). In other words, I buy what people like, but also avoid anything too distinctive that they won't like.
For milk chocolate, I use Callebaut (mostly for price). I do not like Callebaut white (and neither did others in informal taste testing), so I buy either El Rey or Valrhona depending on what I am using it for and what is available at the store.
I am definitely not a pro, but neither is my audience. So I buy something that works for me and them.
Edited by ejw50, 20 October 2007 - 08:57 PM.
#11
Posted 21 October 2007 - 03:19 PM
Milk - I get 665NV - very smooth and caramelly.
White - Excellent WNV - also very smooth and caramelly.
If I don't have access to the Callebaut I find the chocolate sold under the Presidents Choice label very acceptable (but I notice the bars just got a whole lot smaller). The chocolate sold in big bars in Walmart is also excellent.
www.thechocolatedoctor.ca
Confectionary Course • Confectionary Course Q&A
eGullet foodblog 2006 • eGullet Foodblog 2012
#12
Posted 21 October 2007 - 07:05 PM
#13
Posted 21 October 2007 - 09:48 PM
I also use Callebaut for Milk and White, but that has been through inertia and I'll probably try other brands when what I have on hand runs out.
#14
Posted 22 October 2007 - 07:24 AM
I liked the Guittard, it tempered nicely and had good viscosity, but the 72% had a bit of a smoky bitter finish that some of my tasters noticed and didn't like. The Cluizel has always been my favorite, but was financially out of reach until i figured out to order it direct.
#15
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:20 AM
The Chuao is my favorite of all time and the "9" is also really special.
Amedei “9” (Dark) 75%
Amedei Toscano Black (Dark) 70%
Amedei Chuao (Dark)
#16
Posted 23 October 2007 - 06:06 PM
#17
Posted 25 October 2007 - 01:22 AM
http://www.callebaut.com/en/150
Edited by Mikeb19, 25 October 2007 - 01:23 AM.
#18
Posted 26 October 2007 - 11:21 AM
Disclaimer, I am honest, brutally honest when it comes to taste and performance, if I insult anyone that favors with something below or disagrees with my eval, remember it’s all subjective.
In my experience Callebaut make a fine chocolate, but it’s regarded more as a workhorse AP type these days particularly the 60/40 than anything else with exception to their new Origine varieties, I had an opportunity to try some of them at a recent P.W. seminar, they come to within 90% of the flavor profile of manjari and the java noted below.
Cacao Noel has been consigned to the doldrums of a generic class such as American Gourmet’s (Chef’s Club) private label, inexpensive, yet effective.
Valronha, hmmmm we used it exclusively at the President’s guest house the Maybach of couvertures, pricy cost no object, let’s through our food cost out the window.
Cocoa Barry-one of my ATF, consistent, high quality, their Quayaquil is richer and more
Pronounced with less acidity and astringency than for example DGF’s
Des Alpes- good, actually very good-the garnet is a bit mild in the flavor niche,
But their 70% is superior, I use it daily.
Patisfrance- actually very good, hard to get these days though, they have a Java Milk to die for with earthy, spicy, caramel notes-superior.
DGF- I love the absolute white, the milk is ok, and as noted the Quayaquil is on the acidic Side, for you master blender choco wizards out there this is a nice one to throw into your “custom blend mix”
Chocovic-makes a superior 70% and small change dark, intense, yet with subtle notes in the finish, it’s what I refer to as a balanced couverture, carried locally by Metropolitan.
El Rey-deleterious results, poor sheen. Schokinag Chocolate is unfortunately in the same boat, these guys don’t know how to make chocolate in MHO.
Felchlin-the Lucerne 44% will not function with a quick mousse, it seizes. Flavor profile is weak, the matterhorn , is decent, the Edelweiss, is a bit sweet, their Arriba is good though, if at a premium.
#19
Posted 01 December 2007 - 08:05 PM
This critique is based on over twenty five years of fooling around with couverture.
Disclaimer, I am honest, brutally honest when it comes to taste and performance, if I insult anyone that favors with something below or disagrees with my eval, remember it’s all subjective.
In my experience Callebaut make a fine chocolate, but it’s regarded more as a workhorse AP type these days particularly the 60/40 than anything else with exception to their new Origine varieties, I had an opportunity to try some of them at a recent P.W. seminar, they come to within 90% of the flavor profile of manjari and the java noted below.
Cacao Noel has been consigned to the doldrums of a generic class such as American Gourmet’s (Chef’s Club) private label, inexpensive, yet effective.
Valronha, hmmmm we used it exclusively at the President’s guest house the Maybach of couvertures, pricy cost no object, let’s through our food cost out the window.
Cocoa Barry-one of my ATF, consistent, high quality, their Quayaquil is richer and more
Pronounced with less acidity and astringency than for example DGF’s
Des Alpes- good, actually very good-the garnet is a bit mild in the flavor niche,
But their 70% is superior, I use it daily.
Patisfrance- actually very good, hard to get these days though, they have a Java Milk to die for with earthy, spicy, caramel notes-superior.
DGF- I love the absolute white, the milk is ok, and as noted the Quayaquil is on the acidic Side, for you master blender choco wizards out there this is a nice one to throw into your “custom blend mix”
Chocovic-makes a superior 70% and small change dark, intense, yet with subtle notes in the finish, it’s what I refer to as a balanced couverture, carried locally by Metropolitan.
El Rey-deleterious results, poor sheen. Schokinag Chocolate is unfortunately in the same boat, these guys don’t know how to make chocolate in MHO.
Felchlin-the Lucerne 44% will not function with a quick mousse, it seizes. Flavor profile is weak, the matterhorn , is decent, the Edelweiss, is a bit sweet, their Arriba is good though, if at a premium.
#20
Posted 01 December 2007 - 09:18 PM
This critique is based on over twenty five years of fooling around with couverture.
Disclaimer, I am honest, brutally honest when it comes to taste and performance, if I insult anyone that favors with something below or disagrees with my eval, remember it’s all subjective.
Chocovic-makes a superior 70% and small change dark, intense, yet with subtle notes in the finish, it’s what I refer to as a balanced couverture, carried locally by Metropolitan.
I've only tried the Chocovic 71% Guaranda and 71% Ocumare. Loved the Guaranda, hated the Ocumare.
Is this the Chocovic 70% you're referring to?
http://www.amazon.co...e/dp/B000OZW7CA
Edited by merstar, 02 December 2007 - 12:10 AM.
#21
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:04 PM
This critique is based on over twenty five years of fooling around with couverture.
Disclaimer, I am honest, brutally honest when it comes to taste and performance, if I insult anyone that favors with something below or disagrees with my eval, remember it’s all subjective.
Chocovic-makes a superior 70% and small change dark, intense, yet with subtle notes in the finish, it’s what I refer to as a balanced couverture, carried locally by Metropolitan.
I've only tried the Chocovic 71% Guaranda and 71% Ocumare. Loved the Guaranda, hated the Ocumare.
Is this the Chocovic 70% you're referring to?
http://www.amazon.co...e/dp/B000OZW7CA
the Guaranda which uses forastero arriba cocoa from Ecuador and yes is the best of the lot. Chocovic also make a blended Tobago which actually is a 64% that is spectacular, very nice full bodied flavor.
M
#22
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:08 PM
This critique is based on over twenty five years of fooling around with couverture.
Disclaimer, I am honest, brutally honest when it comes to taste and performance, if I insult anyone that favors with something below or disagrees with my eval, remember it’s all subjective.
Chocovic-makes a superior 70% and small change dark, intense, yet with subtle notes in the finish, it’s what I refer to as a balanced couverture, carried locally by Metropolitan.
I've only tried the Chocovic 71% Guaranda and 71% Ocumare. Loved the Guaranda, hated the Ocumare.
Is this the Chocovic 70% you're referring to?
http://www.amazon.co...e/dp/B000OZW7CA
the Guaranda which uses forastero arriba cocoa from Ecuador and yes is the best of the lot. Chocovic also make a blended Tobago which actually is a 64% that is spectacular, very nice full bodied flavor.
M
Thanks, I'll keep my eyes open for the Tobago.
#23
Posted 04 December 2007 - 10:17 PM
#24
Posted 05 December 2007 - 09:02 AM
I just saw that you were in KC- I get it from the Chocolate Store/Mid America Gourmet in Lenexa (or maybe OP, not really sure). Have you been there? They have so much chocolate, and it smells incredible in there!!!!
Edited by golfgirl1227, 05 December 2007 - 09:04 AM.










