I said ESPRESSO not expresso
#1
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:13 PM
The bewildered young Italian looked down at the cup that had been placed in front of him. It was full to the brim with only a wisp of foam or crema on the top. Once again he politely explained what he wanted. The bartender looked blankly at him and said, “I sorry that’s how the machine makes them.” The dejected Italian took a sip, slightly grimaced, put the cup down, paid the bill and tipped the bartender and left.
I have had bad espresso everywhere. Babbo, Spiaggia, Valentino – you name it. Why can’t you get good espresso in the United States? Being served espresso in hand painted Illy cups is grand, but who cares if the coffee is not good.
You can buy the same machines, the same coffee. Why can't they make the coffee? Is it only because the customers don't know the difference?
The next person that puts a lemon slice in my espresso is a dead man.
#2
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:31 PM
#3
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:37 PM
"Remember that a very good sardine is always preferable to a not that good lobster."
- Ferran Adria on eGullet 12/16/2004.
Docsconz - Musings on Food and Life
Slow Food Saratoga Region - Co-Founder
Twitter - @docsconz
#4
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:39 PM
Anyone else have experience with these?
By the way, and slightly off topic, but yesterday the Pope beatified the Capuchin monk who is credited for "discovering" cappuccino. Click for Story
VarmintBites
#5
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:41 PM
It can't be the customers, can it ? Sure, if they don't know what real espresso tastes like, maybe they'll complain less; although frankly, given some of the espresso I've had in the USA, you don't need much experience to know it's crap. But the reality is that there is nothing difficult about making espresso. You just need to buy the right beans and make it fresh every time. My daughters do that with their little £40 aluminium espresso makers in their kitchens at home, and it's fine.
My best guess is that the restaurants simply don't clean out the espresso machines often enough.
And shouldn't this be in the New York Forum
#6
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:47 PM
Sorry - if you want answers about f**ing questions this is the wrong site.Craig, you're the guy that's supposed to give us the answers, we can all ask the f***ing questions.
#7
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:47 PM
VarmintBites
#8
Posted 28 April 2003 - 12:53 PM
It most certainly is the customers and perhaps, most of all the employees of the restaurant who don't know the difference. I have watched hundreds of people drinking horrible espresso without complaint.It can't be the customers, can it ? Sure, if they don't know what real espresso tastes like, maybe they'll complain less; although frankly, given some of the espresso I've had in the USA, you don't need much experience to know it's crap. But the reality is that there is nothing difficult about making espresso. You just need to buy the right beans and make it fresh every time. My daughters do that with their little £40 aluminium espresso makers in their kitchens at home, and it's fine.
By little 'espresso makers' do you mean mocha makers, because you can't make espresso on your stovetop. Mochas and espressos are two different styles of coffee. I love excellent mocha by the way and would take it over bad espresso any day.
One thing for certain you cannot make espresso as great at the espresso in an Italian bar at home. The Italians can't and we can't either. However, when you drop big Pounds or Dollars on a professional grade machine you should be able to produce - especially if you charge for it.
#9
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:00 PM
Varmint, I've seen those espresso packs made by Illy. I have a friend who has one of those cute-but-expensive retro espresso machines (the ones you can stack cups on top and come in a range of sherbet colours), and she just pops one of those packs in the machine and out comes perfect expresso.
I don't buy the water theory. I think it has to do with coffee grind and temperature.
#10
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:03 PM
Yes as Leslie notes - plus the pack of the coffee. This is an advantage of the pods as they are packed correctly.I don't buy the water theory. I think it has to do with coffee grind and temperature.
#11
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:33 PM
By the way, and this has also been extensively discussed on cofffee and espresso machine threads, we're happy with Danesi Gold beans. Danesi has just started to import a black label called Doppio which we've just bought and will try next. We had a shot of this at the restaurant show some time ago and loved it, but they had a real machine.
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#12
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:37 PM
But just take a look at the service that we see in most of our restaurants - Wait people and bussers reaching their hands in front of your face;
tables being bussed before everyone's done with their food; runners asking "who gets the salmon;" I mean, if these things aren't taught at the outset, why should we expect a good/great espresso - which involves a lot of care? It's just another annoying aspect of dining out in our great country.
And, after a number of trips to Italy, and drinking lots of really great espresso for less than $1 a shot, I very rarely will buy a cup in a restaurant here - much less a coffee (as an aside, that's one of the things I like about Gramercy Tavern - the press pot coffee!).
Anyway, now that I roast my own beans my tolerance for shitty coffee has gone way down!
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#13
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:40 PM
#14
Posted 28 April 2003 - 01:40 PM
Bux -I've already forgetten what we paid for Miss Silvia to come sit on our countertop.
I'm jealous because I barely have room for my coffee grinder on my counter top - lots of juggling goes on in my kitchen.
So, when are you gonna start roasting and grinding your own?
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#15
Posted 28 April 2003 - 02:52 PM
i've never been able to make an espresso - crema, taste and all - on a stove-top model. my present braun model - a cheap one - will on the other hand produce quite decent espresso when newly cleaned and when you don't use too much water , and the coffee is correctly pressed. better than at most restaurants in copenhagen, but a few cafés serve absolutely splendid espresso made from illy beans.I think one of the major problems is that it should be made "ristretto (sp)" or "short". On many automated machines, there is a picture of a half cup and one of a whole cup. Most people who don't know what they are doing think they are cheating you if they only give you a half cup. Really, that just matches the amount of water to the beans correctly; double the water gives you all the bitterness. The good flavanoids come our with less water, but the bitter components only come up with more water.
i use lavazza (did i hear gasping?)...illy tends to become too sharp on my machine.
edit: not braun. krups. silly me.
Edited by oraklet, 29 April 2003 - 12:33 AM.
#16
Posted 28 April 2003 - 03:18 PM
I agree that Illy often tastes to sharp on a home machine. Perhaps there is just too much water contact for the roast. I often use Lavazza at home.i use lavazza (did i hear gasping?)...illy tends to become too sharp on my machine.
#17
Posted 28 April 2003 - 03:49 PM
Despite all the variables one must account for while drawing a shot, I cannot believe that espresso's learning is so steep that two-thirds of all baristas and restaurants fail miserably in their attempts. I put the problem at training. Coffee quality is another.
I'm generally impressed with Illy's quality--it's definitely adequate, but there is better.
On the positive side, what restaurants have people had good espresso at? (Even some of the greats, like Charlie Trotter's, have disappointed me. Among the best on the West Coast is Pizzeria Bianco.)
Much peace,
Ian Lowe
ballast/regime
--Chuck Close
#18
Posted 28 April 2003 - 04:20 PM
As for American espresso, it's my experience that in most restaurants nobody has really been trained to pull a good shot properly. When you factor in the semi-mysterious process at work, more often than not the results suck.
The place where my son works bought a new commercial machine when they opened, and the Illy rep came in to train everyone. Even he couldn't get a perfect shot every time, and he said that's typically the case.
Jim
Real Good Food
#19
Posted 28 April 2003 - 04:30 PM
#20
Posted 28 April 2003 - 04:51 PM
Now you tell me. I plead the fifth and will not testify to how much I paid for my Lavazza machine in my mad and obessed search for a good coffee.and drop $600 for a Gaggia Synchrony COMPLETELY automatic espresso maker.
#21
Posted 28 April 2003 - 05:28 PM
But why? The barrista at an Italian bar makes hundreds of shots a week. I have never seen a mistake. Even the espresso they pump out at the bars at the huge trade shows in tiny plastic cups always seem to be right on the mark.The place where my son works bought a new commercial machine when they opened, and the Illy rep came in to train everyone. Even he couldn't get a perfect shot every time, and he said that's typically the case.
What is the mystery?
#22
Posted 28 April 2003 - 05:44 PM
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#23
Posted 29 April 2003 - 12:42 AM
isn't espresso supposed to be made from 100% arabica, anyway? both lavazza and illy is pure arabica, as far as i know. different qualities, roasts and blends, of course.Let me solve this mystery for you, Craig. First, go on line and drop $600 for a Gaggia Synchrony COMPLETELY automatic espresso maker. You drop beans in one bin, water in the other, and push a button. I can hear the moans already, but trust me on this: it makes perfect espresso EVERY time. Not merely "pretty good for an automatic machine, and worth the convenience"-PERFECT. The thing was developed by a Swiss guy for Gaggia. He devoted his entire life to it. He is a genius. I own two of these machines-one here, one in Italy. Then, for my taste, forget about Illy, forget about Lavazza, good as they can be. Go on-line to www.essetti.com. Buy Mauro beans. They have 6 or so grades, including decaf. Top of the line is Atto Primo, which is 100% Arabica, and the richest, mellowest cup you will ever taste. I need the mellowness cut by the characteristic bitter edge of espresso, so I buy De Luxe. The further down the line you go, the stronger and ultimately harsher the blend, as the percentage of Arabica drops. I also believe that the Mauro people are geniuses. But then again, I also believe that Jeffrey Steingarten is a genius! Even if you think that I am a madman for advocating an automatic machine, still try the Mauro.
by the way, there was a dane who was world champion barista a few years ago. works at my favourite cafe in copenhagen. i'm very grateful for that!
#24
Posted 29 April 2003 - 12:53 AM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#25
Posted 29 April 2003 - 06:50 AM
#26
Posted 29 April 2003 - 07:46 AM
CoffeeGeek.com, which I consider to be the definitive online source, lists the robusta claim as #2 on its list of top 10 coffee myths:
2) Robusta beans are necessary in espresso to give the correct body and crema, which is why the Italians use them.
Robusta was initially used in Italian espresso blends because it was cheap; the crema and body were a welcome side effect if you could tolerate the rubbery flavour. In the poorer south of Italy (and most of France) people have grown up with robusta blends and are used to the taste, but in the north there are several roasters (Illy being the most famous) that produce only 100% Arabica blends.
As far as crema and body are concerned, a properly designed Arabica blend can (in my experience) produce better results than any Robusta blend I have tasted. Most of the Robustas used in the world today are still used for the same old reason, cheapness.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#27
Posted 29 April 2003 - 08:29 AM
#28
Posted 29 April 2003 - 08:35 AM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#29
Posted 29 April 2003 - 08:46 AM
"Supposed to be" is an interesting concept. May I submit that what expresso is supposed to be is subjective. I am told that as one moves south in Italy, there's a growing preference for inclusion of robusta beans in the mix. I've been told that robusta is supposed to give a better crema. Those who tell me that, are careful to tell me they're just repeating what they've heard.isn't espresso supposed to be made from 100% arabica, anyway? both lavazza and illy is pure arabica, as far as i know. different qualities, roasts and blends, of course.
We get our beans at DiPalo where Louis is careful not to guide my taste by expressing a preference. He seems to think his customers should drink what they enjoy. There are days when I think the man is a truly subversive force in the foodie community.
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#30
Posted 29 April 2003 - 08:56 AM
I think this is close to the truth. A visit to Tazza d'Oro (for my 60 cents, the best coffee in the world) in Rome confirms your theory -- their standard cafe is very short indeed -- and almost entirely crema. The consistency is closer to that of Parisian hot chocolate than coffee. Not for mere mortals this.I think one of the major problems is that it should be made "ristretto (sp)" or "short". On many automated machines, there is a picture of a half cup and one of a whole cup. Most people who don't know what they are doing think they are cheating you if they only give you a half cup. Really, that just matches the amount of water to the beans correctly; double the water gives you all the bitterness. The good flavanoids come our with less water, but the bitter components only come up with more water.
And speaking of Paris, what shocks me more than the inability to get a good espresso anywhere in the States (the Starbucks effect combined with years of negligence) is nowhere near as shocking to me as the state of coffee in the home of haute cuisine. While the espresso may be marginally better in Paris than in NY (especially in the Michelin starred restaurants), I cannot recall ever having a GREAT cafe in Paris. Shocking!
BTW, if anyone disagrees re: Paris, please respond with suggestions as I will be there this weekend and would love to be proved wrong!









