Stand Mixers 2002–2009
#1
Posted 27 December 2002 - 04:05 PM
Then there are the sizes...4.5qt, 5qt or 6qt?
What are your experiences?
Can anyone provide some insight?
#2
Posted 27 December 2002 - 04:11 PM
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#3
Posted 27 December 2002 - 04:15 PM
#4
Posted 27 December 2002 - 04:54 PM
Though K-aid seems to be coming out with bigger more colorful more powerful models all the time--there still seem to be 3 basic choices--1) the kind where the bowl attaches at the bottom and the mixer head tilts back (least expensive, least good) 2) the kind where the 5 Qt. bowl attaches on an arm which can be raised and lowered with a lever (most common, more expensive, around 325-350 watts but very very good and reliable) and then 3) a slightly larger model, more "powerful" still with the lever, but with a larger, wider bowl. We own a few of the older #2 K5A/K5SS models and they are great, all you could ever need in a small stand mixer, equally good with dough hook, paddle and whip--and we were also given an Epicurean--the newer larger #3 model. Let's say it's 6 quarts. After using it for a while, I don't like it. It stays up on the shelf. The timing and controls are off--inherently sluggish, in the sense the gears and speeds don't shift as well--plus you have to recalibrate all your recipes to larger batches--and face it, some things don't do well in a large bowl in small amounts. And it's just a sense, but I think the quality control has slipped in the newer, larger models.
Bigger isn't necessarily better. If you can tolerate that--and you feel you'd gain by being able to do larger batches of cake batter or need larger amounts of whipped creams or meringues, fine. But I think you might actually find it harder to do pastry things well with this larger bowl size.
Some bread guys I know advocate higher wattage and models like Kenwood and of course pastry pros use Hobart in their shops--but their needs are different. Just be forewarned there is more bitching and moaning on the web about how new Kitchenaids are not as reliable as old. So you might want to read around.
Apart from volume, maybe others could speak to what the added power of some of the professional models bring to the table, but our K5's have been indestructible in demanding use by professionals and would be perfect for the home cook. Around $200 seems a very fair price to pay for such a workhorse that will last a decade at least.
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#5
Posted 27 December 2002 - 06:46 PM
I recently bought the pasta rollers. WOW! It's a great attachment. Making pasta is a breeze.
#6
Posted 27 December 2002 - 07:08 PM
Which model do you own?I have had the meat grinder attachment for 20-30 years and use it any time I need ground meat, as I like the texture. Now there is reason to be concerned about the healthiness of store-ground meat (or worse yet, processing plants), which makes it even more useful.
I recently bought the pasta rollers. WOW! It's a great attachment. Making pasta is a breeze.
#7
Posted 27 December 2002 - 08:22 PM
The meat grinder. We have used it to a great extent, but I've come to prefer grinding meat in the Cuisinart food processor as it chops the meat more cleanly. Others believe it tends to overheat the meat. From time to time we still make good use of the meat grinder for stuffing sausages.
The juicer worked real well, but was overkill for a couple of oranges and we bought a presser anyway.
It's been a while since we bought even the new KitchenAid and a much longer time since I've checked the market on mixers, but back then KichenAid had the lock on mixers with planetary action. It was the only one superior to a manual rotary egg beater. I'm sorry to hear that the KitchenAid machines produced today may not be as reliable as the ones made years ago. If that's the case, one can bet they'll be worse in coming years. Get the better one then, as by the time you can afford it, it may not be as good. By better one, I'm really not thinking the very large one Klc describes as #3 unless you anticipate needing that size bowl. Still, it's hard to speak for someone else.
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#8
Posted 27 December 2002 - 08:32 PM
#9
Posted 28 December 2002 - 09:40 AM
I often think that the 5 qt model with the tilt up head would be easier to use, but I wouldn't want to give up the capacity and power of the larger, fixed head model.
SB (also has all atttachments except roto slicer/shredder)
#10
Posted 28 December 2002 - 09:46 AM
#11
Posted 28 December 2002 - 04:07 PM
As for your original question about the sort of machine to buy today, I'd be cautious about the current KA which is no longer manufactured by Hobart. Search around on the web to see if you can find out about the Kenwood and perhaps other high end manufacturers. King Arthur catalog (which sells both of them ) did a comparison of Kenwood & KA which sort of gave the edge to Kenwood (Kenmore? too lazy to go check).
Hobart still makes a mixer in the home kitchen size, but I believe it costs about $1000. Check their web site. Also, it is possible to find older KA's for sale on EBay.
Bux, what I like about the KA meat grinder is that a single grinding gives the rough texture that I prefer for hamburgers or ragus. But I'll give the Cuisinart a try next time.
#12
Posted 28 December 2002 - 04:54 PM
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#13
Posted 28 December 2002 - 07:56 PM
Like others, I can't vouch for the new models. Perhaps the suggested e-bay run is in order!
#14
Posted 30 December 2002 - 09:42 AM
I now own a Kenwood and I like it better than my old KA. It's more powerful and has been especially helpful because my right arm doesn't let me knead by hand anymore. I haven't bought any attachments for the Kenwood, but I have heard good things about them. However, Kenwood was recently bought by DeLonghi, so the quality of the mixers may have changed.
#15
Posted 07 January 2003 - 07:17 PM
Kitchenaid is discontinuing the 5qt (though they will still make accesories and "parts"). The 6qt is replacing it. My sister has the 4.5qt. We both agree that the screw in bowl and the flip top are irritating- plus the bowl is too small.
I am very happy with the new 6qt (it has only been available for a couple of years).
#16
Posted 07 January 2003 - 08:40 PM
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#17
Posted 07 January 2003 - 08:43 PM
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#18
Posted 07 January 2003 - 08:54 PM
And BTW, you should always knead bread dough by hand; it's good exercise and gets out all your frustrations
#19
Posted 08 January 2003 - 05:34 AM
The interesting thing about this is that Bosch has a similar version of this unit in white plastic--same power rating--at less than half the price. I believe it's called the Bosch Universal and was also at Bloomingdales.
Pastry chef-Restaurant Consultant
Oyamel : Zaytinya : Cafe Atlantico : Jaleo
chef@pastryarts.com
#20
Posted 04 December 2003 - 09:30 AM
What I want to do with a mixer...the regular stuff (batters, foams, etc.) as well as kneading various bread doughs.
I have found this comparison chart to be helpful, but I'd like some confirmation that there really are different transmissions in different mixers. I have heard that the Pro 6qt. has a heavier transmission, but none of the documentation I have found elsewhere seems to say anything about the transmission/gear systems in other mixers.
I have pretty much decided on a 5qt. size, but there are 3 different models of 5qt.'s, so here is my impressions of the three:
Professional 5:
Pros: 350Watts--highest of the three. heavy duty transmission. bowl lift.
Cons: metal dough hook and flat beater--have heard that they can discolor food, and are not dishwasher safe like the nylon counterparts
Heavy Duty:
I think this is the modern version of the standard K5A that everyone's grandmother seems to have. This one seems like the frontrunner right now for its bowl lift, 325 watts, and nylon coated attachments as well as being a bit less in price than the Pro 5.
Artisan:
Pros: Lots of really cool colors
Cons: tilt head & screw bowl--have heard it can strip, and no possibility of water jacket. non-heavy nuty transmission
So there is my recap. Does everyone agree with the 5qt. Heavy Duty as the best choice for a general purpose stand mixer?
Edited by Scotty O, 04 December 2003 - 09:31 AM.
#21
Posted 04 December 2003 - 09:47 AM
#22
Posted 04 December 2003 - 09:53 AM
#23
Posted 04 December 2003 - 09:58 AM
#24
Posted 04 December 2003 - 11:04 AM
Edited by hannahcooks, 04 December 2003 - 11:07 AM.
#25
Posted 04 December 2003 - 11:14 AM
Yeah, I've heard some bad things about the 6qt. I assume these don't carry over to the 5qt. Pro? If thats the case the Pro sounds like the one to get.There's a fair amount of negative opinion about the Pro 6
Yeah, I saw this deal the other weekend and almost snapped it up right there...although it looks like the $30 coupon was just for thanksgiving weekend. Now the coupon is $20, but its still a great deal at $230, maybe even the cheapest of the three.Costco has a $30 coupon now, on a $249 machine.
#26
Posted 04 December 2003 - 11:26 AM
I have to differ. I like the tilt head. My best girlfriend has the heavy duty model and I find it to be futsy getting the bowl and paddle in and out of their seatings. (Pinched my fingers, ow). No really smooth way to do it. Maybe I'm just all thumbs, but that is my preference. I've had mine four years of weekly (more during baking season) home use without problems.
One more thing, buy the extra bowl, comes in very handy.
-Dad
#27
Posted 04 December 2003 - 12:20 PM
i love the tilt head, hate the lifty, hook-on mechanism. when i was purchasing mine (eons ago--still going strong), i spent some time standing at the kitchenaid counter, trying to acclimate myself to the lift-bowl technique...and decided that the tilt head was so intuitive to me,that i would save time and precious brain cells every time i tilted rather than lifted...i stil have a few brain cells left, so there's empirical proof!
the extra bowl is key to kitchne happiness---has saved my sanity a number of times!
www.chezcherie.com
Author of The I Love Trader Joe's Cookbook ,The I Love Trader Joe's Party Cookbook and The I Love Trader Joe's Around the World Cookbook
#28
Posted 04 December 2003 - 12:23 PM
Sorry if I confused anyone.
#29
Posted 04 December 2003 - 01:42 PM
Also, the ones with a tilt head actually have a SMALLER capacity than the lift-bowl models because the head of the mixer is actually lower into the bowl....if you look at the attachments, they're all much shorter than the lift-bowl models. There's an additional few inches of unusable space at the top of the bowl. This makes for less capacity for batters, and this is horrible for doughs.
#30
Posted 04 December 2003 - 02:19 PM
"Ess! Ess! It's a mitzvah!"







