Food facts, my free (as in free) Android application
#1
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:03 PM
I've written an Android application that can be used to look up nutrition info for about 7k food products. The data is from the U.S. Department of Agriculture
It's absolutely free.
It can be downloaded here; https://play.google....nnbech.nutrinfo
You can also just search for "food facts" in the market application on your phone.
(Oh, and the image on the Google Play! store includes a slab of my home cured bacon :-)
I'd love feedback, and suggestions for improvement or new features on the app. It's definitely still under development.
I have attached a couple of screenshots.
Regards,
Glenn
#2
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:28 PM
It looks great. I'm not sure I'd have a use for it, but I hope it does well for you.
My eG Foodblog
eGullet Ethics Code signatory
#3
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:06 PM
Amongst my friends are people who are lactose intolerant, gluten intolerant, allergic to dairy, allergic to soy, and allergic to peanuts...
Including basic allergy information, for example if something contains gluten or lactose, would be a useful addition.
#4
Posted 01 August 2012 - 12:41 AM
@Lesliec. Thanks. I am planning to use it to compute some totals for family "healthy" recipes. I am thinking of building a "meal planner" into it, where you can see the
combined nutrients for a meal, and save favorites. I guess it's right now, more useful for people on diets than foodies :-)
@ChrisZ. I'd love to include Allergy info. I have actually tried to search around a bit for sources with data in a suitable format. I guess I'd need a link between some allergy info and the food #id
from the USDA database.
#5
Posted 01 August 2012 - 12:57 AM
Andrew
#6
Posted 01 August 2012 - 01:37 AM
#7
Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:08 AM
We use the "Calorie Counter" website when on our laptop. It's a bit unruly for use on the phone.
#8
Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:05 PM
It works well on Android tab too, looking forward to see the iPhone version :)
#9
Posted 02 August 2012 - 03:03 AM
Edited by glennbech, 02 August 2012 - 03:04 AM.
#10
Posted 04 August 2012 - 11:45 PM
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
#11
Posted 05 August 2012 - 09:30 AM
I have a feeling it's going to be very handy.
Thanks
Twitter @RanchoGordo
"How do you say 'Yum-o' in Swedish? Or is it Swiss? What do they speak in Switzerland?"- Rachel Ray
#12
Posted 06 August 2012 - 05:16 AM
@minas; Interesting. There seems to be carbs missing. 60g of carbs, 0g sugar and 4,5g of fiber. Have to look into that. I isn't by any means alcohol in it?
#13
Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:49 AM
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
#14
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:43 AM
1) How well is the metric system integrated into US cooking/nutrition labelling nowdays? Since I'm from Europe, and was unsure, I added values in ounces just to be sure.
2) The data source, from the USDA, is very very detailed. As an example; it lists 10+ items for Beef Brisket, with abbreviations like "Beef, brisket, flat half,ln & Fat, 1/8" Fat, sel, ckd, brsd." Is this something that people would normally understand?
#15
Posted 09 August 2012 - 11:19 AM
By the way; A few questions from the developer; Answers very welcome.
1) How well is the metric system integrated into US cooking/nutrition labelling nowdays? Since I'm from Europe, and was unsure, I added values in ounces just to be sure.
2) The data source, from the USDA, is very very detailed. As an example; it lists 10+ items for Beef Brisket, with abbreviations like "Beef, brisket, flat half,ln & Fat, 1/8" Fat, sel, ckd, brsd." Is this something that people would normally understand?
1) From what I've seen, the standard Nutrition Information Label on products sold here provides portion size in English volumetric or weight - as in "cups", "tbsp" or "oz" and then gives the metric equivalent in grams. Thereafter, the component information (fat, carbs, protein and so on) is given in metric units - g and mg.
2) That seems like a specialized level of detail. Nutritionists might care to that level, but I wonder how many others would. I myself find it mildly interesting from a laboratory perspective (how did they get these numbers) and too fussy to be useful...but I am neither nutritionist nor food scientist.
"Every day should be filled with something delicious, because life is too short not to spoil yourself. " --Ling (with permission)
"There comes a time in every project when you have to shoot the engineer and start production."
--author unknown
#16
Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:42 AM
Further to your Question #2 above: I still can't say how many other people would be interested, but now that I've pIayed with it I find the information very useful. I tend to cook from scratch, so it's useful to me to see how different treatments of an ingredient affect the nutritional value. (If you find information for "eggplant, roasted, drained" and "eggplant, roasted, undrained" - however they would be abbreviated - please add it!)
I *love* the "weight" feature that automatically scales the portion size as I request.
"Zink" is misspelled; in English it's "Zinc".
It's unfortunate but explained why the breakdown of calories from fat, carbs, protein don't necessarily add up. However, I don't understand why the units listed are kcal. Aren't those the same as Calories?
I think I'll be using this a lot. By the way, I'm using a 10" ASUS tablet and it looks great.
Edited to add: on the cover page that features asparagus, the title word "Asparagus" is missing the second 'a'. I like the look of those photos and quick summaries of featured foods.
Edited by Smithy, 10 August 2012 - 07:52 AM.
"Every day should be filled with something delicious, because life is too short not to spoil yourself. " --Ling (with permission)
"There comes a time in every project when you have to shoot the engineer and start production."
--author unknown
#17
Posted 10 August 2012 - 01:35 PM
I've been playing with the app a bit this morning, and have some comments and questions.
Further to your Question #2 above: I still can't say how many other people would be interested, but now that I've pIayed with it I find the information very useful. I tend to cook from scratch, so it's useful to me to see how different treatments of an ingredient affect the nutritional value. (If you find information for "eggplant, roasted, drained" and "eggplant, roasted, undrained" - however they would be abbreviated - please add it!)
I *love* the "weight" feature that automatically scales the portion size as I request.
"Zink" is misspelled; in English it's "Zinc".
It's unfortunate but explained why the breakdown of calories from fat, carbs, protein don't necessarily add up. However, I don't understand why the units listed are kcal. Aren't those the same as Calories?
I think I'll be using this a lot. By the way, I'm using a 10" ASUS tablet and it looks great.
Edited to add: on the cover page that features asparagus, the title word "Asparagus" is missing the second 'a'. I like the look of those photos and quick summaries of featured foods.
First of all; thanks a lot for spending time with the application. I am sorry to say that "Eggplant Roasted" is not in the database :-)
I will fix the spellings & kcal->calories for the next release. I see that it is confusing to list the "total" in calories and the breakdown in kcal.
On the 10" there is some stretching of the images that I do not like, So I plan on making a special layout for the larger tablets. I test it on my samsung galaxy tab 10, just to check.
The USDA has a special database for retention values that shows how nutrients if different foods are affected by boiling, fryinig etc.I was tempted to include the data, but the application would have
become even larger, I also think the data is very "special interest" :-)
Again; thanks for using it, just post a message in this thread with any suggestions.










