Caramelizing v. browning onions
#1
Posted 05 October 2011 - 11:44 AM
Am I wrong in the belief that there's a difference? Browned onions certainly have a different taste and texture from what I call caramelized, but now I'm wondering. What's the story?
Janet A. Zimmerman, aka "JAZ"
Manager
jzimmerman@eGullet.org
eG Ethics signatory
About.com guide, Cooking for Two
Ten ways you can help the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
#3
Posted 05 October 2011 - 02:15 PM
There is a big difference between onions that are slowly caramelized over fairly low heat and "browned" onions that are cooked more rapidly over higher heat.
The latter is the "classic" cooked onions served with liver and a bit of blackening on a few of the onions is okay (to my taste).
And, all the technical jargon aside, the various degrees of cooking onions can vary so widely that I don't think there could ever be a universal agreement about it.
What may seem underdone to me, may be perfect for someone else.
Edited by andiesenji, 05 October 2011 - 02:15 PM.
My blog:Books,Cooks,Gadgets&Gardening
#4
Posted 05 October 2011 - 10:11 PM
The most recent cookbook I got says something about cooking onions until brown in a matter of 2-3 minutes for most recipes, which seems wrong, even on pretty high heat.
#5
Posted 06 October 2011 - 09:28 AM
I think I have. The quick browned onions have more of a charred, sometimes slightly bitter taste to them whereas with caramelized onions, it's mainly the sweetness I taste.Do you notice a considerable difference in taste between quick-browned vs. slowly caramelized onions?
“Peter: Oh my god, Brian, there's a message in my Alphabits. It says, 'Oooooo.'
Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios.”
– From Fox TV’s “Family Guy”
#6
Posted 06 October 2011 - 12:09 PM
Also, the texture is quite different. The long-cooked onions are very soft, kind of gelatinous. They're almost a paste. The quick brown ones, while not exactly crunchy, still have some body and the onion pieces remain separate.I think I have. The quick browned onions have more of a charred, sometimes slightly bitter taste to them whereas with caramelized onions, it's mainly the sweetness I taste.
Do you notice a considerable difference in taste between quick-browned vs. slowly caramelized onions?
Janet A. Zimmerman, aka "JAZ"
Manager
jzimmerman@eGullet.org
eG Ethics signatory
About.com guide, Cooking for Two
Ten ways you can help the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
#7
Posted 06 October 2011 - 12:30 PM
Many other writers e.g. Madhur Jaffrey underestimate the length of time required.
I learned the hard way not to try to caramelize anything in a Le Creuset, eventually found the confirmation in a Richard Olney cookbook. Do it in an all-clad or similar pan.
#8
Posted 06 October 2011 - 12:36 PM
And there is your difference explained: the ones that are cooked longer are more... well, cooked. Which is to say that the cell walls are more thoroughly broken down, etc. This is effectively the only difference. With quick-cooked onions, you are only really cooking and getting Maillard reactions on the surface of the onion while the interior is relatively unaltered, whereas with long-cooked onions you are getting reactions and temperature changes throughout the whole piece of onion. The browning reaction, meanwhile, is pretty much the same in both cases.Also, the texture is quite different. The long-cooked onions are very soft, kind of gelatinous. They're almost a paste. The quick brown ones, while not exactly crunchy, still have some body and the onion pieces remain separate.
Your question is a bit like asking: "why are greens cooked for 1 minute different from greens cooked for an hour?" They're different because one is much more broken down by cooking than the other.
#9
Posted 06 October 2011 - 12:44 PM
While I understand that the Maillard reaction is responsible for mostly of the browning in both cases, I always that there was some true caramelization in the long cooked onions. As you quoted Wolke in the topic linked to above:. . . the ones that are cooked longer are more... well, cooked. Which is to say that the cell walls are more thoroughly broken down, etc. This is effectively the only difference. With quick-cooked onions, you are only really cooking and getting Maillard reactions on the surface of the onion while the interior is relatively unaltered, whereas with long-cooked onions you are getting reactions and temperature changes throughout the whole piece of onion. The browning reaction, meanwhile, is pretty much the same in both cases.
Is that not true?. . . Maillard reactions are responsible for the good flavor of heat-browned, carbohydrate- and protein-containing foods such as grilled and roasted meats (yes, there are sugars in meats), bread crusts and onions. "Caramelized" onions do indeed taste sweet, because in addition to Maillard reactions, heating makes their starch break down into free sugars, which can then truly caramelize.
Janet A. Zimmerman, aka "JAZ"
Manager
jzimmerman@eGullet.org
eG Ethics signatory
About.com guide, Cooking for Two
Ten ways you can help the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
#10
Posted 06 October 2011 - 01:13 PM
(The emphasis is mine.)
Edited by slkinsey, 06 October 2011 - 01:14 PM.
#11
Posted 06 October 2011 - 02:12 PM
So caramelize onions with the lid on, until you get the caramel color, then remove the lid to finish to get a nice brown color, not charred ?
paul
I'm a wee bit slow.. Sorry
#12
Posted 07 October 2011 - 05:12 PM
#13
Posted 08 October 2011 - 01:13 PM
www.kayatthekeyboard.wordpress.com
#14
Posted 16 November 2011 - 08:52 AM
I was under the impression that maillard reactions took place at a lower temperature than caramelization does (Ive read books that indicate caramelization occurs at 160-180C and Maillard occurs strongest at 149-154C. So Im a little confused about how it would be possible to trigger caramelization in onions without going through significant maillard reactions(a lot of browning)
#15
Posted 16 November 2011 - 10:12 AM
No, it's exactly the opposite. You are Maillardizing the onions. After you have done this, you can turn up the heat to high and caramelize some of the sugars. But caramelization doesn't happen until the temperature is fairly high, and it happens at different temperatures for different sugars: fructose begins at 110C/230F, galactose, glucose and sucrose begin at 160C/320F and maltose begins at 180C/356F. As you may imagine, you really only only have a chance of caramelizing the fructose in a wet food like onions.Just to clarify, when you cook onions low and slow to 'caramelize' them, are we talking mainly about the sugars caramelizing, and less of maillard reactions?
#16
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:26 PM
I caramelize about five pounds of onions at a time in my slow-cooker -- slice, pile into the slow-cooker, throw in a stick of butter, sprinkle on a little kosher salt, turn it on low and ignore it for about 18 hours. Perfectly caramelized onions, every time. I portion them out in about one-cup portions and freeze in plastic bags. And then when it's time for French onion soup -- thaw out a bag of frozen beef stock, a bag of frozen caramelized onions, add the big crouton, and Presto!
Can you specify more on this?
I know a guy who needs to cook for twenty people on occasion, and this would save a lot of time and money.









