Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Ruth Reichl selling stuff


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 12:44 PM

Very revealing interview with former Gourmet editor-in-chief (and New York Times restaurant reviewer) Ruth Reichl. She is now in the business of creating what I'd characterize as advertorial content for Gilt Taste. She says, among other things:

Is there a line being crossed when you merge commerce and journalism?

There isn't any line to cross. We're one unit. That firewall that used to exist has been eroding for years. We wouldn't be selling something if we weren't proud of it. And we wouldn't write about something we weren't interested in.... Now, I don't have a publisher asking, "can you use these products in a recipe?" just because they're an advertiser.


The full interview is here.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#2 rotuts

rotuts
  • participating member
  • 2,445 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 01:11 PM

although i dont know the details,

Mr Potato Head said in Toy Story 3:

"Money, Money, Money"

after all he was a Potato and a Head.

:laugh:

then there was the older quote From That Movie:

"Show Meeeeeeeeee The Money!"

even earlier:

Gecko said: "Greed is Good"

:huh:

thats Us Today. check the financials tomorrow in the NYTimes its all there Plain to See

you might check the WSJ, but I hear they have a problems with their Phones.

Edited by rotuts, 01 October 2011 - 01:23 PM.


#3 butterscotch

butterscotch
  • participating member
  • 242 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 01:45 PM

Not seeing a link, so here is one.



http://mobile.latime...31&DPS=0&DPL=10

#4 IndyRob

IndyRob
  • participating member
  • 773 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 02:15 PM

I was just browsing the site trying to get a feel for what it was all about. I clicked on a story (read: Recipe) on a gruyere and chanterelle grilled cheese. At the bottom were comments. The first discussion involved someone saying they were adding chanterelles to their grocery list, followed by someone asking where he could find chanterelles (Not sure if he missed the hyperlink or was being funny). This was followed by someone helpfully informing him where he could source chanterelles locally.

Ah well, perhaps if this doesn't work out then Ruth can write the Trader Joe's Fearless Flyer.

[Edit]Removed redundant 'perhaps'

Edited by IndyRob, 01 October 2011 - 02:25 PM.


#5 LindaK

LindaK
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,850 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 03:18 PM

Earlier this summer, a member who was working on the web site asked us for our opinion: Gilt Taste

I appreciate Reichl's honesty about doing away with the line between journalism and commerce in food publications. But it doesn't inspire me to check it out. When someone links to it because of a really good piece of writing, then I'll look at the site.


 


#6 janeer

janeer
  • participating member
  • 1,003 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 06:23 PM

Very revealing interview with former Gourmet editor-in-chief (and New York Times restaurant reviewer) Ruth Reichl. She is now in the business of creating what I'd characterize as advertorial content for Gilt Taste. She says, among other things:

Is there a line being crossed when you merge commerce and journalism?

There isn't any line to cross. We're one unit. That firewall that used to exist has been eroding for years. We wouldn't be selling something if we weren't proud of it. And we wouldn't write about something we weren't interested in.... Now, I don't have a publisher asking, "can you use these products in a recipe?" just because they're an advertiser.


The full interview is here.

So: Gourmet cared about conflict of interest. Ruth is now part of an adverising-driven revenue model, instead of a content-driven revenue model. Everyone engaged in conflicts of interest always says what she does: it doesn't change what we do. I suggest she might want to read some of the research on this.

#7 JBailey

JBailey
  • society donor
  • 293 posts

Posted 01 October 2011 - 09:03 PM

Isn't Ruhlman doing the same thing with Open Sky? The line between self-promotion or flogging a book then morphs when someone begins generating revenue from those of us who want to know what tools someone might be using. Then again, lots of chefs are under contract to promote various products. Maybe this did in fact start with the decline of print magazines with codes of ethics for writers...at least those writers had the review of superiors before engaging in promotion.
"A cloud o' dust! Could be most anything. Even a whirling dervish.
That, gentlemen, is the whirlingest dervish of them all." - The Professionals by Richard Brooks