Ideal size for a hot dog
#1
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:21 AM
So now I'm wondering, is there an ideal size for a hot dog? I've seen them ranging from 10-to-a-pound (Papaya King size) to 2-to-a-pound (Junior's in Brooklyn). What is best?
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#2
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:26 AM
This of course, only applies to hot dogs.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#3
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:27 AM
I guess my question is really about the ideal diameter.
Though I do love the end bites most of all.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#4
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:28 AM
#5
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:37 AM
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#6
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:37 AM
But then, I've never been a size queen myself
#7
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:48 AM
#8
Posted 18 September 2002 - 10:50 AM
#9
Posted 18 September 2002 - 11:09 AM
The Man, The Myth
TapItorScrapIt.com
#10
Posted 18 September 2002 - 11:19 AM
TioPacho.com
"I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members." -- Groucho Marx
#11
Posted 18 September 2002 - 04:35 PM
#12
Posted 18 September 2002 - 05:56 PM
If these dogs are in natural casings, the thinner ones are probably sheep casings and the thicker ones are hog casings. That being said, I've never done a taste test between different size and source casings.Yet there's a marked difference in taste, owing I suppose to the ratio of casing to meat and perhaps the way in which a thicker hot dog heats up.
#13
Posted 18 September 2002 - 07:37 PM
Since I have three pounds of these things to work with, I'm going to try some alternate cooking methods. It may be that even longer, slower cooking than I'm accustomed to is the way to go. I'll also try splitting the dogs to create more surface area.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#14
Posted 18 September 2002 - 08:40 PM
#15
Posted 19 September 2002 - 05:55 AM
#16
Posted 19 September 2002 - 04:51 PM
#17
Posted 19 September 2002 - 05:07 PM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#18
Posted 19 September 2002 - 05:09 PM
#19
Posted 19 September 2002 - 05:15 PM
Perhaps splitting them exposed too much surface area unprotected by casing, thereby allowing too much juice to seep forth. Maybe after splitting, you should sear the exposed meat to lock in the juices.Today I tried splitting one of the 1/4 pound Black Bears and cooking it long and slow. It came out much, much better than my previous attempt, but the extended cooking time sacrificed too many juices. Still working on a way to make the big ones taste as good as the small ones, if it's even possible.
(
#20
Posted 19 September 2002 - 05:44 PM
I think it would be helpfull to bring a pot of water to a boil. Then turn off the water and place the franks in the pot and cover it. Let simmer (not boil) for about 8-10 minutes and then throw the dogs on the griddle. They will be cooked more evenly from the inside (from simmering) and will get that good grilled taste w/o letting the juices escape. Then if you still like the smaller dogs better; it will probably be because of the amount of meat to casing ratio rather than the dogs not being cooked long enough. As I said, the Schickhaus franks I cooked (1/4 lb with casing) took forever. The hot dog places throw theirs on the griddle and let cook for a few hours on low heat. Father & Son does this and they only use 8 to a lb. Max's also cooks theirs for a long time. I usually don't have the patience; but I have cooked some for a long time. The casing does keep in the juices and gives the casing a nice charred, slightly burnt crunch.
Syd's, which uses a long 5 to a lb frank boils theirs, and then finishes them off on a charcoal grill. Many consider this the best all beef dog in Jersey. Jerry's simmers theirs, and throws them on a steel griddle (actually a small steel box) for only a few minutes. The result is a dirty water dog with extra crunchiness. Also a favorite of many.
Oh, and Freud was a weenie.
#21
Posted 19 September 2002 - 07:34 PM
Again, bigbear may have the underlying issue pinned down - a feminine voice on this thread is necessary.I don't think a female has posted yet.
So, what's important...
diamater?
length?
buns?
is seepage an issue (assuming the seepage is not 100%)?
is dirty water ok?
These are important questions and you cannot just find the answers by casting tea leaves in Tommy's mug...at least not any answers that I want to hear...or see...or tas...
uggggh...uhhhh, I'll quit.
#22
Posted 19 September 2002 - 07:54 PM
#23
Posted 22 September 2002 - 09:45 PM
I simmered two dogs. One of them I ate straight from the pot, with no further cooking. I really can't imagine why anybody would prefer a boiled hot dog.
The other one, I pulled from the water and put into a cast-iron skillet on medium heat until it crisped up a bit. It was superb. I may actually need to revise my opinion on the diameter issue altogether. But I'll need to perform the experiment with the large and small ones side-by-side to be sure.
The combination of simmering and crisping on the griddle, however, is definitely my new favorite way to cook a hot dog.
It's interesting: A hot dog is theoretically a fully cooked product already. Yet making a hot dog taste its best is about much more than just heating it. It seems to me that heating a hot dog does more than just raise its temperature and -- in the case of dry heat from a griddle, grill, broiler, or whatever -- create a crust. It seems to alter the flavor. Perhaps the spices are affected by the heat. I'm not sure. But now that I look back I think that an insufficiently heated hot dog may have a certain harshness to it that a fully heated one does not. Has anybody else noticed anything like this?
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#24
Posted 23 September 2002 - 05:22 PM
I don't prefer boiled dogs either, although a decent beef dog isn't bad in a pinch if that's your only choice. One thing that's nasty is a pork and beef dog boiled. Or steamed. That's what you get at Hot Dog Johnny's. The actual dog served is pretty good; second in my opinion to Thumann's for a pork and beef dog. See the Hot Dog Johnny's thread. But the dog is good grilled, griddled, fried or simmered and grilled. Not boiled. The cooking method makes all the difference. I would never have a Thumann's boiled. These German style dogs are bland when boiled and beef dogs only a little better. You know the difference between a boiled Sabrett at a pushcart and a grilled Sabrett at Gray's Papaya.
What's interesting is that the people at Usinger's (Wisconsin) serve their dogs boiled in the employee cafeteria and actually reccomend this way of cooking when you buy from them. Ditto for Chicago and Vienna Beef. Their reasoning is like you said. The product is already cooked; they just need to be heated. But we know that certain cooking methods produce different tastes.
I've simmered and then grilled (on a griddle and charcoal grill) and one other benefit is that it saves a little time. Plus it makes sense that the dogs would cook more evenly. I've also simmered the dogs and put them in a frying pan for a minute or 2. It is like a boiled dog, but with more flavor and snap. Jerry's and George's (original owners of these places were brothers) in Elizabeth cook their dogs this way. Both are very popular. Many times if I'm just hanging out watching tv and having some beer; I'll just throw some dogs on the griddle and cook them for awhile. The casing usually keeps in the juices and prevents the dog from getting dried out.
If, you're in Jersey, you gotta try Syd's (simmered and charbroiled). I've gotten these dogs (long 5 to a lb) from Best's and cooked them this way and they taste identical to Syd's. And with a big savings. Syd's is great (one of my top 5 or so dogs) but they charge $3.00 a dog. But yet they are always crowded. They also make a terrific reuben.
#25
Posted 23 September 2002 - 05:24 PM
#26
Posted 23 September 2002 - 07:00 PM
#27
Posted 09 October 2002 - 04:29 PM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#28
Posted 09 October 2002 - 06:03 PM
#29
Posted 09 October 2002 - 10:34 PM
I haven't done any side-by-side tasting yet. I wouldn't do that without you, John.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#30
Posted 10 October 2002 - 01:31 PM
Forget my question I just saw the answer on the supermarket hotdog thread,









